Aggregating Fuzzy QL- and (S,N)-Subimplications: Conjugate and Dual Constructions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5540/tema.2015.016.03.0229Keywords:
Median aggregation, t-sub(co)norms, Fuzzy (sub)implications, QL-implications, (S, N)-implications.Abstract
Fuzzy (S,N)- and QL-subimplication classes can be obtained by a distributive n-ry aggregation performed over the families of t-subnorms and t-subconorms along with a fuzzy negation. Since these classes of subimplications are explicitly represented by t-subconorms and t-subnorms verifying the generalized associativity, the corresponding (S,N)- and QL-subimplications, referred as I(S,N) and I_(S,T,N), are characterized as distributive n-ary aggregation together with related generalizations as the exchange and neutrality principles. Based on these results, the both subclasses I_(S,n) and I_QL of (S,N)- and QL-subimplications which are obtained by the median aggregation operation performed over the standard negation N_S together with the families of t-subnorms and t-subconorms S_P and T_P, respectively. In particular, the subclass T_P extends the product t-norm T_P as well as S_P extends the algebraic sum S_P. As the main results, the family of subimplications I_(S_P,N) and I_(S_P,T_P,N) extends the implication class by preserving the corresponding properties. We also present an extension from (S,N)- and QL-subimplications to (S,N)- and QL-implications and discuss dual and conjugate constructions.
References
G. Mayor and J.Monreal, “Additive generators of discrete conjunctive aggregation op- erations”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15, No. 6 (2007) 1046–1052.
S.Rasheed, D.Stashuk, and M.S.Kamel, “Integrating heterogeneous classifier ensembles for EMG-signal decomposition based on classifier agreement”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14, No. 3 (2010) 866–882.
H. Izakian, W. Pedrycz and I. Jam, “Clustering spatio temporal data: an augmented fuzzy C-Means”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, 21, No.5 (2013), 855–868.
B. Geng, J. K. Mills and D. Sun, “Two-Stage charging strategy for plug-In electric vehicles at the residential transformer level”, IEEE Transaction on Smart Grid, 4, No.3 (2013), 1442–1452.
E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar and E. Pap, Triangular Norms, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2000.
T. Calvo, A. Kolesárová, M. Kormoníková, and R. Mesiar, “Aggregation operators: Properties, classes and construction methods”, in Aggregation Operators New Trends and Applications (T. Calvo, G. Mayor, and R. Mesiar, Eds.), Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 97, pp. 3–106, Springer, 2002.
V. Torra, “Aggregation operators and models”, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 156 No. 3 (2005) 407–410.
H. Bustince, T. Calvo, B. D. Baets, J. C. Fodor, R. Mesiar, J. Monteiro, D Paternain and A. Pradera, “A class of aggregation fucntions encopassing two-dimensional OWA operations”, Inf. Science, 180 No. 10 (2010) 1977–1989.
G. Beliakov, H. Bustince and J. Fernandez, “The median and its extensions”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1175 (2011) 36–47.
J. Wang, K. Li and H. Zhang, “Multi-criteria decision-making method based on in- duced intuitionistic normal fuzzy related aggregation operators”, Intl. Journal of Un- certainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 20 No. 04 (2012) 559–578.
H. Bustince, M. Galar, B. Bedregal, A. K. a, and R. Mesiar, “A new approach to interval-valued Choquet integrals and the problem of ordering in interval-valued fuzzy set applications”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, 21 No. 6 (2013) 1150–1162.
G. Cornelis, G. Deschrijver and E. Kerre “Implications in intuitionistic fuzzy and interval-valued fuzzy set theory: construction, classification and application”, Intl. Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 35 (2004) 55–95.
G. Deschrijver and E. Kerre, “Implicators based on binary aggregation operators in interval-valued fuzzy set theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 153 No. 2 (2005) 229–248.
K. T. Atanassov, “My personal view on intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory”, in Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions: Representation, Aggregation and Models, (H. B. Sola, F. Her- rera, and J. Montero, Eds.) Ser. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 220, pp. 23–43, Springer, 2008.
B. Bedregal, G. Dimuro, R. Santiago and R. Reiser, “On interval fuzzy S- implications”, Inf. Science, 180 (2010) 1373–1389.
G. Dimuro, B. Bedregal, R. Santiago and R. Reiser, “Interval additive generators of interval t-norms and interval t-conorms”, Inf. Sciences, 181 No. 18 (2011) 3898–3916.
G. Beliakov, H. Bustince, S. James, T. Calvo and J. Fernandez, “Aggregation for Atanassov’s intuitionistic and interval valued fuzzy sets: the median operator”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20, pp. 487–498, 2012.
R. Reiser and B. Bedregal, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy implications – con- struction, properties and representability”, Inf. Sciences, 248 no. 1 (2013) 68–88.
R.Reiser,B.Bedregal,andG.A.A.dosReis,“Interval-valuedfuzzycoimplications”, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80, No. 2 (2014) 10–425.
D. Li, L. Wang, and G. Chen, “Group decision making methodology based on the Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy set generalized OWA operator”, Intl. Journal of Un- certainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 18 no. 6 (2010) 801–817.
C. da Costa, B. Bedregal, and A. D. Neto, “Relating De Morgan triples with Atanassov’s intuitionistic De Morgan triples via automorphisms”, Intl. J. Approx. Rea- soning, 52 no. 4 (2011) 473–487.
J. Lin and Q. Zhang, “Some continuous aggregation operators with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Inf. and their application to decision making”, Intl. Journal of Un- certainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 20 no. 2 (2012) 185–209.
H. Bustince, E. Barrenechea, and M. Pagola, “Generation of interval-valued fuzzy and Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy connectives from fuzzy connectives and from kα operators: Law of conjuntions and disjuntions, amplitute”, Intl. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23 (2008) 680–714.
L. Visintin, R. Reiser, and B. Bedregal, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy impli- cations”, in IEEE Pos-Proceedings of the Workshop-School on Theoretical Computer Sciences, Pelotas, 2011, pp. 46–52, DOI:10.1109/WEIT.2011.22.
M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy Inf. aggregation in decision making”, Intl. Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52 no. 3 (2011) 395–407.
M. Xia, Z. Xu, and N. Chen, “Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, 22 no. 2 (2013) 259–279.
B. Bedregal, R. Reiser, H. Bustince, C. Lopez-Molina, and V. Torra, “Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms”, Inf. Sciences, 255 no. 1 (2014) 82–99.
R. Reiser, B. Bedregal and M. Baczyn ́ski, “Aggregating fuzzy implications”, Inf. Sci- ence, 253 (2013) 126–146.
I. Benitez, R. Reiser, A. Yamin and B. Bedregal, “Aggregating Fuzzy QL- Implications”, IEEE Xplore Digital Library Pos-Proceedings of 3rd Workshop-School on Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 121 – 128, DOI:10.1109/WEIT.2013.11.
Y. Shi, B. V. Gasse, D. Ruan and E. E. Kerre, “On the first place antitonicity in QL- implications”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159 no. 22 (2008) 2988–3013.
E. Klement, R. Mesiar and E. Pap, “Triangular norms. position paper I: basic analyti- cal and algebraic properties”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 143 no. 1 (2004) 5–26.
M.Baczyn ́ski and B. Jayaram, “QL-implications: Some properties and intersections”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161 (2010) 158–188.
L. Kitainik, Fuzzy Decision Procedures with Binary Relations.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1993.
H. Bustince, P. Burillo and F. Soria, “Automorphisms, negations and implication operators”, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 134 no. 2 (2003) 209– 229.
M.Baczyn ́ski and B. Jayaram, “(S,N)- and R-implications: A state-of-the-art survey”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159 no. 14 (2008) 1836–1859.
M. Mas, M. Monserrat and J. Torrens, “On interval fuzzy negations”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158 (2007) 2612–2626.
G. Maksa, “Quasisums and generalized associativity”, Aequationes Mathematicae, 69 no. 1-2 (2005) 6–27.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase impact and the citation of the published work (See The effect of open access).
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the
author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access
Intellectual Property
All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License under attribution BY.