Fusion of Online Assessment Methods for Gynecological Examination Training: a Feasibility Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5540/tema.2018.019.03.423Keywords:
Fusion of assessment methods, online assessment, Fuzzy Naive Bayes, virtual reality, gynecological examinationAbstract
The objective of this paper was to determine if a fusion of online assessment methods is a feasible methodology for online assessment of performance of users inside virtual reality simulators. Three different forms of the Fuzzy Naive Bayes method based on statistical distributions were used to assess specific tasks and the fusion of information was performed by a Weighted Majority Voting system. Data was compiled representing a portion of the Gynecological Exam, which is a checkup examination that is routinely performed for women and is paramount in finding earlier cases of cervical cancer. Confusion matrices and Kappa coefficients were obtained using a Monte Carlo simulation for this method. From the analysis of these results, it is possible to confirm that this method performed well, with a substantial agreement degree.References
R. Moraes and L. Machado, “Another approach for fuzzy naive bayes applied on online training assessment in virtual reality simulators,” in Proceedings of Safety Health and Environmental World Congress, pp. 62–66, 2009.
G. Burdea, G. Patounakis, V. Popescu, and R. E. Weiss, “Virtual reality-based training for the diagnosis of prostate cancer,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1253–1260, 1999.
G. C. Burdea and P. Coiffet, Virtual Reality Technology. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed., 2003.
A. Gallagher, N. McClure, J. McGuigan, I. Crothers, and J. Browning, “Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (mist vr),” Endoscopy, vol. 31, no. 04, pp. 310–313, 1999.
P. B. McBeth, A. J. Hodgson, and M. Karim Qayumi, “Quantitative methodology of evaluating surgeon performance in laparoscopic surgery,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 02/10: Digital Upgrades, Applying Moore’s Law to Health, vol. 85, p. 280, 2002.
J. Rosen, C. Richards, B. Hannaford, and M. Sinanan, “Hidden markov models of minimally invasive surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pp. 279–285, 2000.
R. M. Moraes and L. S. Machado, “Assessment systems for training based on virtual reality: A comparison study,” SBC Journal on 3D Interactive Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2012.12
L. D. S. Machado, R. M. De Moraes, and M. K. Zuffo, “Fuzzy rule-based evaluation for a haptic and stereo simulator for bone marrow harvest for transplant,” in 5th Phantom Users Group Workshop Proceedings, Citeseer, 2000.
M. Färber, E. Hoeborn, D. Dalek, F. Hummel, C. Gerloff, C. A. Bohn, and
H. Handels, “Training and evaluation of lumbar punctures in a vr-environment
using a 6dof haptic device.,” Studies in health technology and informatics,
vol. 132, pp. 112–114, 2007.
J. Huang, S. Payandeh, P. Doris, and I. Hajshirmohammadi, “Fuzzy classification: towards evaluating performance on a surgical simulator,” Studies in health technology and informatics, vol. 111, pp. 194–200, 2005.
D. Ruta and B. Gabrys, “An overview of classifier fusion methods,” Computing and Information systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2000.
A. D. dos Santos, “Simulação médica baseada em realidade virtual para ensino e treinamento em ginecologia,” Master’s thesis, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 2010.
INCA, “Inca - intituto nacional de câncer,” 2017.
H. Carcio and R. M. Secor, Advanced health assessment of women: Clinical skills and procedures. Springer Publishing Company, 2010.
H. Tahani and J. Keller, “Information fusion in computer vision using fuzzy integral operator,” IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 20, 1990.
L. I. Kuncheva, Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.
D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Possibility theory: qualitative and quantitative aspects,” in Quantified representation of uncertainty and imprecision, pp. 169–226, Springer, 1998.
L. A. Zadeh, “Probability measures of fuzzy events,” Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 421–427, 1968.
H.-P. Störr, Y. Xu, and J. Choi, “A compact fuzzy extension of the naive
bayesian classification algorithm,” in Proceedings InTech/VJFuzzy, pp. 172–
, 2002.
R. MARCOS DE MORAES and L. dos Santos Machado, “A fuzzy exponential naive bayes classifier,” in Uncertainty Modelling in Knowledge Engineering and Decision Making: Proceedings of the 12th International FLINS Conference(FLINS 2016), vol. 10, p. 207, World Scientific, 2016.
R. M. Moraes and L. S. Machado, “Online assessment in medical simulators based on virtual reality using fuzzy gaussian naive bayes.,” Journal of Multiple Valued Logic & Soft Computing, vol. 18, 2012.
R. M. Moraes and L. S. Machado, “A fuzzy binomial naive bayes classifier for epidemiological data,” in Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2016 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 745–750, IEEE, 2016.
G. M. Foody, “Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment,” Remote sensing of environment, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 185–201, 2002.
R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
J. Cohen, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. educational and psychosocial measurement, 20, 37-46,” 1960.
R. M. Moraes and L. S. Machado, “Psychomotor skills assessment in medical training based on virtual reality using a weighted possibilistic approach,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 70, pp. 97–102, 2014.
J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,” biometrics, pp. 159–174, 1977.
E. A. d. M. G. Soares and R. M. Moraes, “Assessment of poisson naive bayes classifier with fuzzy parameters using data from different statistical distributions,” pp. 57–68, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors of articles published in the journal Trends in Computational and Applied Mathematics retain the copyright of their work. The journal uses Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) in published articles. The authors grant the TCAM journal the right to first publish the article.
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
The content of the articles is the exclusive responsibility of the authors. The journal uses Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) in published articles. This license allows published articles to be reused without permission for any purpose as long as the original work is correctly cited.
The journal encourages Authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts, publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and social media, as long as the full citation is included in the journal's website version.
